Case study · Stampin' Up!

Customer Email Marketing Strategy

A welcome program built from zero contacts to a measurable revenue line, with consent and infrastructure built from scratch across 14 markets.

The email program photographed in situ: the blog signup pop-up on a laptop screen, with the first welcome email open on a phone beside it.
Timeline
Q3 2025 to Q4 2025
Role
Lead designer, email program
Team
Solo design + outside email specialist
Tools
FigmaMailchimp

The challenge

Stampin’ Up! had no email marketing program at all: no campaigns, no welcome emails, no automated sequences sent to the tens of thousands of contacts on file. That left revenue on the table, with no channel to re-engage buyers or nurture new visitors. The existing list couldn’t be reused either, since there was no proper consent on file and EU markets required explicit GDPR opt-in.

Constraints

Four conditions shaped the work before any design started. None of them moved.

  • Legal GDPR compliance across 14 international markets

    Forced an explicit double opt-in flow and killed any shortcut imports.

  • Legal Tens of thousands of contacts with no proper consent

    The existing list couldn’t be migrated. The program rebuilt from zero.

  • TechnicalScope No prior email infrastructure or owned channel

    Vendor selection, deliverability setup, and consent management landed in scope before any design work began.

  • Resource Limited internal email-marketing expertise

    I partnered with a specialist and focused on experience design and storytelling rather than deliverability.

Approach

The frame I started with.

Where are visitors already most engaged with the brand, and how do we meet them there instead of interrupting them? Signup placement was the lever. The welcome series only matters if people sign up in the first place.

Options I considered.

  1. Single footer form. Low friction, low capture.
  2. Multi-channel touchpoints across blog, checkout, and footer. More complex, but matches where customers actually engage.
  3. Gated lead magnet alone. High capture, but narrows the audience to download-seekers.
Where do we meet engaged visitors?
chosen
Multi-channel touchpoints Blog, checkout, footer
Footer form only Low friction, low capture
Lead magnet only High capture, narrow reach
Decision tree showing three options considered, with multi-channel touchpoints highlighted as the chosen path chosen Where do we meet engaged visitors? Footer form only Low friction, low capture Multi-channel touchpoints Blog, checkout, footer Lead magnet only High capture, narrow reach
Three options · chosen path highlighted in sage

The pick and why.

Multi-channel touchpoints, weighted by intent. Each placement matches a different moment of engagement: blog exit-intent for casual readers, checkout for high-intent buyers, footer as the persistent fallback. The system meets customers in the mode they’re already in.

Discovery

What the data told us

  • Blog High traffic, high bounce Visitors read and left without acting. Strong case for an exit-intent trigger.
  • Checkout High intent, low friction Capturing a subscriber feels like a natural next step after a purchase.
  • Footer Always on Present on every page. The catch-all for everyone else.

Three engagement patterns, three placements. The signup system meets people where they already are.

Research

What competitors weren't doing

Competitive analysis across crafting and e-commerce brands showed the same gap everywhere: signup treated as a form, not a moment.

The field
  • A single footer form, no welcome sequence behind it
  • Email address only
  • Multi-market consent unsolved
This program
  • Three placements weighted by engagement intent
  • Name, language preference, and signup source captured up front
  • Explicit double opt-in cleared in all 14 markets

Capturing language preference up front mattered most. Personalization at scale falls apart without it.

A/B Testing

The test

We tested a free downloadable craft project against a control offering just the signup confirmation on the blog pop-up. The incentive version substantially outperformed on signups.

That result shaped the welcome series architecture. Pop-up signups get Email 1a with the download link. Footer and checkout signups get Email 1b without it, and both paths merge at Email 2. It gave leadership something concrete to point to, and it kept the series honest: download signups got exactly the project the pop-up promised.

The signup flow, incentive variant. Form to confirmation.

Solution

The welcome series

Four emails designed to feel like a conversation, not a funnel, each one earning the next.

  • Email 1 · Welcome. Warm brand intro. Download for pop-up signups (1a); same welcome without it for footer and checkout signups (1b).
  • Email 2 · Get Inspired. Project ideas and techniques that build confidence and excitement, no products yet.
  • Email 3 · Products. Curated tools and materials, framed as recommendations once the brand has earned that context.
  • Email 4 · Community. Real crafter stories and an invite to join, landing after three emails of genuine value.

System Diagram

How it all connects

Three signup sources, one consent layer, two welcome paths that merge into a single four-email arc.

signup sources 3 placements
Footer signup
Checkout signup
Blog pop-up
Consent + tracking GDPR · 14 markets · name · language · source
standard
Welcome Email 1b
download
Welcome + free project Email 1a · download
paths merge
Get Inspired Email 2
Products Email 3
Community Email 4
Email program architecture: three signup sources feed a consent layer, which splits into two welcome paths that merge into a four-email series. signup sources 3 placements standard download Footer signup Every page Checkout signup Purchase intent Blog pop-up Exit-intent Consent + tracking GDPR · 14 markets · name · language · source Welcome Email 1b Welcome + free project Email 1a · download Get Inspired Email 2 Products Email 3 Community Email 4

Visual Gallery

Welcome series previews

Four emails, four moments, each designed with a specific subscriber state in mind. Each is a faithful recreation of the production template, rebuilt under a stand-in brand to keep client work confidential.

Email 1 welcome message with its free template download offer, shown on a phone propped against a stack of craft cardstock
Email 1. Welcome
Email 2, Get Inspired, project ideas and creative techniques shown on a phone in the same propped scene
Email 2. Get Inspired
Email 3, Products, a curated look at tools and materials shown on a phone in the same propped scene
Email 3. Products
Email 4, Community, crafter stories and an invitation to join shown on a phone in the same propped scene
Email 4. Community

Results

7-figure
Revenue attributedFrom a channel that previously didn't exist.
Thousands
New signupsAcross 14 markets in the first months live.
14
Markets clearedGDPR-compliant double opt-in across every region we shipped into.
4
Welcome emailsThe arc from first contact to first considered purchase.

Revenue and signup figures are shown as ranges to respect company confidentiality. Structural facts (markets, email count) are exact.

What I'd carry forward

The best UX work isn't always on a screen someone sees every day. Consent flows, signup placements, and a four-email narrative arc. None of those are flashy. But they turned an idle contact list into a channel that generates revenue every week.

What made it work was scope clarity. I focused on experience and storytelling. The email specialist focused on data and delivery. Neither of us tried to own both sides. That division let the work get to a quality level it wouldn't have reached otherwise.

If I were starting again, I'd run the A/B test earlier. We validated the download incentive partway through, which meant the welcome series structure had already been roughed out without it. Running the test first would have let the data inform the architecture from the beginning rather than confirming a decision already in motion.